People v. Jarman CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 23, 2013C072131California941 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/23/13 P. v. Jarman CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Glenn) ----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, C072131, C073038

v. (Super. Ct. No. 11SCR07151)

WILLIAM JARMAN,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appointed counsel for defendant William Jarman asked this court to review the records in this consolidated appeal to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) We note the administrative fee of $35 must be reduced to the statutory maximum of $30. We find no other arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant. As modified, the judgment is affirmed. We provide the following brief description of the facts and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.