Leyte-Vidal

Leyte-Vidal v. Semel

Good Law
163 Cal. Rptr. 3d 641·2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 849·220 Cal. App. 4th 1001·2013 WL 5744224
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 23, 2013H037762California5,407 words

Opinion

Opinion

Elia, J.

In this appeal plaintiff Miguel A. Leyte-Vidal challenges an order sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend in his shareholder derivative action against officers and directors of Yahoo! Inc., a publicly traded company incorporated in Delaware and headquartered in Sunnyvale. Plaintiff contends that he adequately pleaded facts excusing the presuit requirement of a demand on the board of directors to pursue litigation on the corporation’s behalf. We agree with the superior court, however, that plaintiff failed to allege demand futility with the particularity required under Delaware law. Accordingly, we will affirm the judgment dismissing the action.

Procedural Background

Plaintiff initiated this action on July 17, 2009, asserting five causes of action against 15 individual defendants associated with Yahoo!. One day earlier plaintiff had dismissed a similar lawsuit he had maintained in federal district court. In his original complaint in superior court he alleged insider selling, in violation of Corporations Code section 25402; breach of fiduciary duty for improper financial reporting, insider selling, and misappropriation of material nonpublic information; abuse of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.