Steve Harris v. Amgen, Inc.

Caution
738 F.3d 1026·2013 WL 5737307·2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 21503
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 23, 201319-35044California9,295 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fletcher, J.

ORDER

The opinion filed on June 4, 2013, and published at 717 F.3d 1042 (9th Cir.2013), is withdrawn and replaced by the attached opinion.

With the filing of the new opinion, the panel has voted unanimously to deny the petition for rehearing. Judge Fletcher has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judges Farris and Kor-man so recommend.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge of the court has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc, filed June 18, 2013, are DENIED.

OPINION

Plaintiffs, current and former employees of Amgen, Inc. (“Amgen”) and its subsidiary Amgen Manufacturing, Limited (‘(MIL”), participated in two employer-sponsored pension plans, the Amgen Retirement and Savings Plan (the “Amgen Plan”) and the Retirement and Savings Plan for Amgen Manufacturing, Limited (the “AML Plan”) (collectively, “the Plans”). The Plans were employee stock-ownership plans that qualified as “eligible individual account plans” (“EIAPs”) under 29 U.S.C. § .1107(d)(3)(A). All of the plaintiffs’ EIAPs included holdings in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.