Coombs

Coombs v. Cunningham CA1/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 24, 2013A131914California13,360 words

Opinion

Opinion

Richman, J.

Filed 10/24/13 Coombs v. Cunningham CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

MICHAEL COOMBS et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents,

A131914

v. ARCHIBALD CUNNINGHAM, (San Francisco City & County Super. Ct. No. CPF-10-510760) Defendant and Appellant.

Appellant Archibald Cunningham appeals from the trial court’s denial of his petition to vacate an arbitration award and entry of judgment confirming the award in favor of respondents Michael Coombs and Tamara Woods. Appellant asks that we vacate the award and remand the matter to the superior court for numerous reasons. These include that the superior court erroneously granted respondents’ petition to compel arbitration based upon an invalid arbitration agreement; the court and/or the arbitrator did…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.