Yu

Yu v. Fitch Construction CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 24, 2013G047756California3,037 words

Opinion

Opinion

FACTS

Fitch CA On December 15, 1993, Kent Fitch, on behalf of the Fitch Corporation,1 an Arizona corporation doing business in California as Fitch Plastering Corporation, drafted a letter to the California Secretary of State. In the letter, the Fitch Corporation gave consent for the use of the name Fitch Plastering Corporation of California to be incorporated. Articles of Incorporation for Fitch Plastering Corporation of California (Fitch CA) were filed with the California Secretary of State the same day. California Secretary of State documents from years later indicate Fitch CA’s address was 26801 Vista Terrace, Lake Forest, California, 92630, its president was Samuel Fitch, its secretary and agent for service of process was Monty Fitch, and its chief financial officer was McKinley Fitch. One of its directors was Kent Fitch, the same person who, on behalf of the Fitch Corporation, consented to use of the name Fitch Plastering

The Fitch Corporation’s address was 20702 Linear Lane, El Toro, California 92630.

2 Corporation of California in 1993.2 Fitch CA’s contractor’s license was issued on October 17, 1994, and it expired October 31, 2010. Northland never issued an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.