Roupinian

Roupinian v. Doss Law CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 25, 2013B242655California3,766 words

Opinion

Opinion

Johnson, J.

Filed 10/25/13 Roupinian v. Doss Law CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

EDWARD ROUPINIAN, Individually and B242655 as Cotrustee, etc., et al., (Los Angeles County Plaintiffs and Appellants, Super. Ct. No. BC404638)

v.

DOSS LAW et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Mary Ann Murphy, Judge. Affirmed. Robert D. Feighner; Hitchcock, Bowman & Schachter and Robert B. Schachter for Plaintiffs and Appellants Edward Roupinian, Arlene Roupinian, Alice Hoch and Millennium Trust Company, LLC. Nemecek & Cole, Jonathan B. Cole, Mark Schaeffer and Robert Scott Silver for Defendants and Respondents Doss Law, Kristin L. Yokomoto and Gregory S. Page. ——————————…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.