Ismael Mendosa-Hernandez v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
543 F. App'x 736
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 25, 201312-71594California241 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Ismael Mendosa-Hernandez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review de novo questions of law. Banuelos-Ayon v. Holder, 611 F.3d 1080, 1082 (9th Cir.2010). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA correctly concluded that each of Mendosa-Hernandez’s 2007 and 2010 convictions under California Penal Code § 273.5(a), which resulted in 5- and 3-year prison sentences, respectively, constitutes an aggravated-felony crime of violence under 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a)(43)(F) that renders him statutorily ineligible to seek cancellation of removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a)(3); see also Banuelos-Ayon, 611 F.3d at 1083 (“[A] conviction under California Penal Code § 273.5(a) is categorically a crime of violence.... ”).

We must reject Mendosa-Hernandez’s challenge to this court’s decision in Banue-los-Ayon. See Avagyan v. Holder, 646 F.3d 672, 677 (9th Cir.2011) (“A three judge panel [generally] cannot reconsider or overrule…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.