Fredy Gonzalez-Arroyo v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
543 F. App'x 734
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 25, 201318-50440California410 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Fredy Amilcar Gonzalez-Arroyo, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review de novo questions of law, and review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Santos-Lemus v. Mukasey, 542 F.3d 738, 742 (9th Cir.2008). We deny the petition for review.

The agency correctly determined that Gonzalez-Arroyo’s conviction for violating California Penal Code § 273.5(a) is categorically an aggravated felony crime of violence under 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a)(43)(F), where he was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of at least one year. See Banuelos-Ayon v. Holder, 611 F.3d 1080, 1083 (9th Cir.2010); see also United States v. Gonzalez-Tamariz, 310 F.3d 1168, 1170-71 (9th Cir.2002) (an offense classified as a misdemeanor under state law may be considered an aggravated felony under 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a)(43)); Alvarez-Barajas v. Gonzales, 418 F.3d 1050, 1054 (9th Cir. 2005) (aggravated felony definition applies to convictions entered “before, on, or after” the enactment of the Illegal Immigration Reform…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.