Apac
Apac v. Bpa
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 28, 201317-56607California22,329 words
Opinion
Opinion
PAEZ, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC AGENCY No. 11-73178
CUSTOMERS,
Petitioner,
OPINION
v.
BONNEVILLE POWER
ADMINISTRATION,
Respondent,
CITIZENS UTILITY BOARD OF
OREGON; EUGENE WATER &
ELECTRIC BOARD; IDAHO POWER
COMPANY; NORTHWEST
REQUIREMENTS UTILITIES; PUGET
SOUND ENERGY, INC.; PACIFICORP;
PACIFIC NORTHWEST GENERATING
COOPERATIVE; PUBLIC POWER
COUNCIL; PUBLIC UTILITY
COMMISSION OF OREGON; PUBLIC
UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 OF COWLITZ
COUNTY, WASHINGTON; PUBLIC
UTILITY DISTRICT NO.1 OF
SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 OF
BENTON COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
THE CITY OF SEATTLE,
Respondents-Intervenors. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Bonneville Power Administration
Argued and Submitted February 19, 2013—Portland, Oregon
Filed October 28, 2013
Before: Arthur L. Alarcón, Stephen S. Trott, and Richard A. Paez, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Paez; Dissent by Judge Alarcón
SUMMARY*
Bonneville Power Administration
The panel denied a petition for review of a decision of the Bonneville Power Administration adopting the Residential Exchange Program…