City of Bell v. Super. Ct.
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 25, 2013B247362NCalifornia10,677 words
Opinion
Opinion
Croskey, J.
Filed 10/25/13 (10/9/13 modification & unmodified opn. attached)
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
CITY OF BELL, B247362
Petitioner, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC445497) v.
ORDER
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF (1) MODIFYING OPINION LOS ANGELES, (2) DENYING PETITION FOR
REHEARING
Respondent; [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]
ROBERT A. RIZZO,
Real Party in Interest.
BY THE COURT:
It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on October 4, 2013, and modified on
October 9, 2013, is further modified as follows:
(1) On page 3, under the second full paragraph under the heading ―2‖, The
Underlying Actions, line 4, the sentence ending, ―still in office, a fact which prevented
the City from taking action in its own name.‖ Please add a footnote at the end of
sentence which reads:
1 Rizzo challenges this fact, relying on press releases and newspaper articles
which purportedly…