City of Bell v. Super. Ct.

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 25, 2013B247362NCalifornia10,677 words

Opinion

Opinion

Croskey, J.

Filed 10/25/13 (10/9/13 modification & unmodified opn. attached)

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

CITY OF BELL, B247362

Petitioner, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC445497) v.

ORDER

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF (1) MODIFYING OPINION LOS ANGELES, (2) DENYING PETITION FOR

REHEARING

Respondent; [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]

ROBERT A. RIZZO,

Real Party in Interest.

BY THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on October 4, 2013, and modified on

October 9, 2013, is further modified as follows:

(1) On page 3, under the second full paragraph under the heading ―2‖, The

Underlying Actions, line 4, the sentence ending, ―still in office, a fact which prevented

the City from taking action in its own name.‖ Please add a footnote at the end of

sentence which reads:

1 Rizzo challenges this fact, relying on press releases and newspaper articles

which purportedly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.