People v. Guadarrama CA4/1

DISCUSSION

Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief setting forth the facts and

proceedings below. Counsel presents no argument for reversal, but asks that this court

review the record for error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.

Pursuant to Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, counsel has not identified any

possible appellate issues, but does note he has specifically reviewed whether appellant

was sentenced in accordance with the terms of his plea agreements and entered his pleas

freely and voluntarily.

We granted Guadarrama permission to file a brief on his own behalf. He has not

responded.

A review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436 and

Anders v. California, supra, 386 U.S. 738, has disclosed no reasonably arguable appellate

issue. Competent counsel has represented Guadarrama on this appeal.

The facts are taken from the change of plea form. 3

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

HALLER, J.

WE CONCUR:

BENKE, Acting P. J.

MCINTYRE, J.

4