City of Irvine v. County of Orange CA4/3

Good Law
164 Cal. Rptr. 3d 586·2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 947·221 Cal. App. 4th 846·2013 WL 6145644
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 28, 2013G047895California6,861 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aronson, J.

Plaintiff and appellant City of Irvine (Irvine) sued to compel defendants and respondents County of Orange and the County of Orange Sheriff-Coroner (collectively, County) to set aside their decision to approve and submit an application for state funding to expand one of the County’s jail facilities. Irvine alleged the County’s application constituted a project approval under the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.; CEQA) and therefore required the County to prepare an environmental impact report (EIR) analyzing the County’s plans to expand its jail facilities before approving and submitting the application. The trial court disagreed and denied Irvine’s petition for writ of mandate.

We affirm. The County’s application did not constitute a project approval under CEQA because it did not commit the County to a definite course of action regarding the expansion of its jail facilities. The application was merely a preliminary step in the state process for counties to seek funding for jail expansion. Indeed, the state’s process did not require the County to initiate a CEQA review of its expansion plans until after the County submitted its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.