R.S.
R.S. v. Superior Court CA1/2
Opinion
Opinion
INTRODUCTION
R.S. (Mother) seeks writ review of an order terminating reunification services at the conclusion of the six-month review hearing for her infant daughter and setting of a Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 hearing. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.452; Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26.)1 2 Mother asserts the court erred in denying her six more months of reunification services as there was a substantial probability that the child would be returned safely within the extended services period. She further contends the court erred in finding the Humboldt County Department of Health and Human Services
1 Unless otherwise indicated, all statutory references are to the Welfare and Institutions Code and all rule references are to the California Rules of Court. 2 The father has not challenged that order.
1 (the department) provided reasonable services. We shall conclude these contentions are without merit and shall deny this writ petition.
BACKGROUND
A. Detention, Jurisdiction and Disposition Less than a week after her birth, the child was removed from her parents, who were engaged in repeated incidents of domestic violence and had mental health issues. The child was…