People v. Blaylock CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 29, 2013H037847California3,115 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/29/13 P. v. Blaylock CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE, H037847

(Santa Clara County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. C1072509)

v.

IRVIN WARD BLAYLOCK,

Defendant and Appellant.

In this domestic violence case, defendant Irvin Ward Blaylock appeals a judgment of conviction following a jury trial. On appeal, defendant asserts the trial court erred in admitting his interview regarding the crimes into evidence. In addition, defendant argues the court erred in allowing the prosecutor to charge him with felony criminal threats (Pen. Code, § 422),1 and corporal injury of a spouse (§ 273.5, subd. (a)), because there was not a transactional relationship between those crimes and the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.