Massoyan

Massoyan v. Otto CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 29, 2013F064875California5,852 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/29/13 Massoyan v. Otto CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

VICKEN MASSOYAN et al., Consolidated Case Nos. F064875 & Plaintiffs and Respondents, F065392

v. (Super. Ct. No. 09CECG01839)

KATHLEEN OTTO et al.,

OPINION

Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. Donald S. Black, Judge. Callahan & Blaine, Daniel J. Callahan, Marc P. Miles, and Kimberly A. Knill for Defendants and Appellants. Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, Ara Jabagchourian, Aron K. Liang; Dowling, Aaron & Keeler, Donald R. Fischbach, for Plaintiffs and Respondents. -ooOoo- In California, when no probate estate is opened, a surviving spouse is personally liable for the debts of a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.