In re U.M. CA1/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 29, 2013A138813California355 words

Opinion

Opinion

Richman, J.

Filed 10/29/13 In re U.M. CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

In re U.M., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

U.M.,

Petitioner, v.

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF A138813

ALAMEDA,

(Alameda County Respondent; Super. Ct. No. SJ10014653)

THE PEOPLE,

Real Party in Interest.

Respondent court declared U.M. a ward because of his habitual truancy (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 601, subd. (b)). Matters did not improve, and on Friday, April 19, 2013, the court ordered the ward “remanded . . . to do an in-custody WETA [Weekend Training Academy]” for the weekend about to commence. On May 31, 2013, the ward filed this petition for an extraordinary writ “directing and prohibiting respondent court from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.