In re L.P. CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
I. INTRODUCTION
On this appeal from a juvenile court dispositional order, defendants and
appellants, J.P. (Mother) and R.J. (Father), raise three claims of error: (1) their history of
methamphetamine use is insufficient to support the court‟s jurisdictional findings that the
children were at risk of abuse or neglect (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 300, subd. (b));1 (2) the
court abused its discretion in ordering the children removed from parental custody at
disposition (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 361, subd. (c)(1)); and (3) inadequate notice of the
proceedings was given under the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) (25 U.S.C.A. § 1901
et seq.) and related California law (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 224.2, 224.3).
We reject the parents‟ first and second claims of error, but plaintiff and
respondent, San Bernardino County Children and Family Services (CFS), concedes its
ICWA notice lacked known information concerning paternal relatives. Father is the only
parent who may have Indian heritage. The ICWA notice did not include information
concerning any paternal relatives other than Father even though names of the paternal
grandparents were known or readily available to CFS when the notice was…