Arout

Arout v. Lamel CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 29, 2013B242873California3,892 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/29/13 Arout v. Lamel CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

SOHIAL AROUT, B242873

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC481043) v.

BARRY H. LAMEL et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Terry A. Green, Judge. Affirmed.

Sohial Arout, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Early, Maslach & O‘Shea, John A. Peterson; Law Office of Priscilla Slocum and Priscilla Slocum, for Defendants and Respondents.

_________________________ Plaintiff and appellant Sohial Arout (Arout), who has filed this appeal in propria persona, appeals from an order granting a special motion to strike under Code of Civil…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.