Elmore Jameson Co. v. Smith

Good Law
34 Cal. App. 2d 609·93 P.2d 1063
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 20, 1939Civ. 2332; Civ. 2341; Civ. 2342California2,689 words

Opinion

Opinion

Griffin, J.

J.—The above-numbered actions were consolidated on appeal. One action, commenced July 1, 1932, was an ordinary action upon a promissory note and to foreclose a crop mortgage dated July 19, 1929, executed by Leslie Smith, mortgagor, to John J. Elmore, mortgagee, which mortgage was given as security for its payment upon all crops to be grown upon certain premises in Imperial County during the term of a certain lease held by the mortgagor from David N. Barry and George Diddock.

Plaintiff sought a restraining order and applied for the appointment of a receiver. Leslie Smith and Grace Smith, by way of answer, alleged the execution of some independent written agreement between John J. Elmore and Leslie Smith which they claimed was unfulfilled and repudiated and that by virtue thereof the mortgage “has been abandoned by the said John J. Elmore”. T. N. Montgomery set up in a cross-complaint a request for an accounting and also alleged that he did on October 9, 1931, accept from Grace Smith and Leslie Smith two chattel mortgages (duly recorded, but recorded subsequent to the execution and recordation of the Elmore mortgage), upon certain crops to be grown on the same premises, believing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.