Hubbard

Hubbard v. Matson Navigation Co.

Good Law
1939 Cal. App. LEXIS 128·34 Cal. App. 2d 475·93 P.2d 846
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 6, 1939Civ. 10748California2,005 words

Opinion

Opinion

Peters, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of nonsuit in favor of defendants Matson Navigation Company and the Oceanic Steamship Company. The plaintiff has dismissed as to the third defendant, S. Degnan.

Appellant was a cabin passenger for hire on respondents’ steamship Monterey, traveling between Honolulu and San Francisco. According to the evidence, on January 27, 1934, she fell from her berth and suffered the injuries which form the basis of this action. She had taken passage under a signed written contract evidenced by a contract ticket. This ticket, on its face, states:

On the back of the ticket appears the following:

At the conclusion of appellant’s case (which we may assume for present purposes showed that the injuries were proximately caused by respondents’ negligence), respondents moved for a nonsuit on the grounds that no written notice of claim had been filed with them within thirty days of the time of landing, and the action was not commenced within ninety days of that date, as required by the terms of the contract of passage above quoted. It is admitted that no written claim was filed with the companies until July 24, 1934, about six months after the accident, and that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.