Estate of Howe

Good Law
1947 Cal. App. LEXIS 1027·81 Cal. App. 2d 95·183 P.2d 329
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 29, 1947Civ. 15769California692 words

Opinion

Opinion

Doran, J.

This is an appeal from an order granting a family allowance and homestead in probate proceedings.

The record reveals the following as correctly recited in appellant’s brief:

The pertinent portion of the prenuptial agreement is as follows:

In deciding in favor of respondent, the court commented as follows at the conclusion of the trial:

The court found as a fact that “it is true that the language of said pre-nuptial agreement does not show that said parties thereto intended that said Myra B. Howe thereby waived her right to claim a probate homestead and a widow’s allowance; and it is true that said Myra B. Howe did not, by or through said pre-nuptial agreement waive her right either to a probate homestead or to a widow’s allowance.” Also that the property described as the homestead was the separate property of the deceased.

It is contended by appellant that ‘ ‘ The only question presented by this Appeal, as it was the only question presented to the Court below, is whether or not by the pre-nuptial agreement Myra B. Howe waived her right to a probate homestead and to a family allowance.”

The prenuptial agreement also contained the following language:

The argument is without…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.