Rose

Rose v. Tandowsky

Good Law
1947 Cal. App. LEXIS 1414·80 Cal. App. 2d 927·183 P.2d 347
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 22, 1947Civ. 15667, 15779California3,344 words

Opinion

Opinion

White, J.

This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment decreeing him to be the father of the minor child of plaintiff and ordering him to pay $100 per month for the child’s support. Defendant also has appealed from an order allowing plaintiff additional counsel fees upon the appeal. The two appeals have been consolidated and presented upon a single set of briefs.

The action was commenced in November, 1945, to establish paternity of a child born May 21, 1940. Plaintiff testified that she first met the defendant, a physician practicing in Hollywood, in 1934; that in the year 1936, she commenced having sexual relations with the defendant at his office after business hours, and that their relations continued up to the time of the conception of the child in August, 1939; that she had no relations with any other man during this period.

According to plaintiff’s testimony, upon discovering her pregnancy, it was decided by plaintiff and defendant that she should go to San Francisco. The defendant visited her in San Francisco, was with her for three days, and gave her some money. Plaintiff returned to Los Angeles and the child was born in a Los Angeles hospital. At defendant’s suggestion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.