Mayer

Mayer v. State Bar

Good Law
1934 Cal. LEXIS 465·2 Cal. 2d 71·39 P.2d 206
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 18, 1934L. A. 14222California1,056 words

Opinion

Opinion

Curtis, J.

This is a proceeding instituted for the purpose of reviewing the action of the board of governors of The State Bar of California in recommending the. disbarment of petitioner as an attorney at law of this state. The local administrative committee before whom the charges against petitioner were originally heard made its findings that the petitioner had violated section 29 of the State Bar Act by wilfully breaching rule 2 of the Rules of Professional Conduct; that petitioner had committed acts involving moral turpitude, as defined by section 287, subdivision 5, of the Code of Civil Procedure in the course of his activities as an attorney at law,- and that petitioner had committed a misdemeanor in violating section 159a of the Penal Code of the state of California. The committee recommended his suspension from the practice of the law for one year. The board of governors adopted the findings of the local administrative committee, but made the recommendation to this court that petitioner be disbarred from the practice of the law.

■ Rule 2 of the Rules of Professional Conduct of The State Bar reads as follows: “A member of The State Bar shall not solicit professional employment by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.