Markham

Markham v. Fralick

Good Law
1934 Cal. LEXIS 487·2 Cal. 2d 221·39 P.2d 804
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 29, 1934L. A. 14551California2,164 words

Opinion

Opinion

Curtis, J.

This action is one in unlawful detainer. The property in controversy was under a ninety-nine year lease. The lessees, the defendants and respondents in this action, were in default in the payment of some $30,000 rent besides taxes which they had agreed to pay. The leased premises were a city block in Hollywood on which were located some fifteen dwellings or bungalows occupied by ten or twelve subtenants. The defendants were in possession of the property only through their subtenants. Their agent collected the rents and paid, them to his principals, the defendants. While the defendants were in default in the payment of said rent and taxes, the plaintiff, the owner of said property, served written notice on the defendants to pay the rent and taxes due and unpaid, or quit and surrender the property to the plaintiff within three days after the service of said notice. No such notice, nor any notice whatever, was ever served by plaintiff on any of the subtenants. Within three days after the service of said notice, the defendants served written notice upon the plaintiff and her attorney of their surrender of the premises to the plaintiff as demanded by the notice served upon the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.