J.—This is an appeal from the judgment. As recited in respondent’s brief, “In an information filed by the District Attorney of Los Angeles County, appellant was charged with the crime of robbery, in that she did wilfully, unlawfully, feloniously and by means of force and fear take from the person and immediate presence of George W. Chown Sixteen Dollars ($16.00) in money. The information also charged appellant with the prior convictions, in the State of Texas, of the crime of Assault to Commit Bobbery, a felony, in 1937, and the crime of Bobbery, a felony, in 1939.

Appellant contends that the testimony of Mr. Chown, the complaining witness, is inherently improbable and unbelievable, and therefore insufficient to support the judgment.

As pointed out by respondent, “With regard to the prosecution’s testimony pointed out in appellant’s brief, the most that can be said of it is that perhaps others in the same situation might have reacted in some other manner than did the complaining witness. This is a far cry indeed from testimony ‘so obviously and so inherently improbable as to leave the court no recourse without self-stultification except to reverse the judgment.’

Evidently the trial court believed that the element of force and fear, essential for the crime of robbery was not sufficiently proven, but that the evidence presented did warrant and require the conviction of appellant for the lesser and included offense of grand theft from the person.

As contended by respondent, “Thus even if the Court rejected that portion of the testimony regarding the appellant’s use of a knife and the resultant fear of the witness, the remainder of the evidence presented was sufficient to support the conclusion of the trial court that appellant was guilty of the crime of Grand Theft from Person.”

That the evidence supports the judgment there is no question.

Judgment affirmed.

White, P. J., and Fourt, J., concurred.