Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of California

Bad Law
1988 Cal. LEXIS 261·253 Cal. Rptr. 426·47 Cal. 3d 376·764 P.2d 278·19 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20427
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 1, 1988S001922California18,487 words

Opinion

Opinion

Eagleson, J.

In this action, we determine the sufficiency of an environmental impact report (EIR) on the proposed relocation within the City of San Francisco of biomedical research facilities of the School of Pharmacy at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF).

A neighborhood association challenges the EIR on three primary grounds; (1) that it does not discuss anticipated future activities at the new location and the effects of those activities; (2) that it does not adequately discuss feasible alternatives to the project; and (3) that there is no substantial evidence the project’s adverse environmental effects will be mitigated. These challenges are based on the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.).

We find the EIR was inadequate because: (1) it fails to discuss the anticipated future uses of the new facility and the environmental effects of those uses, and (2) the discussion of alternatives is inadequate under CEQA. We find, however, there is substantial evidence the environmental effects identified in the present EIR will be sufficiently mitigated. We also find the Court of Appeal properly determined the neighborhood…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.