International Society for Krishna Consciousness of California Inc. v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
530 F.3d 768·2008 WL 2331428·2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 12258
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 9, 200801-56579California3,549 words

Opinion

Opinion

ORDER CERTIFYING A DETERMINATIVE QUESTION OF LAW TO THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT

ORDER

We certify the question set forth in Part II of this order to the California Supreme Court. The answer to the certified question depends upon California law. The California Supreme Court’s answer will be determinative of the appeal presently before us. We find no clear controlling precedent in the decisions of the California Supreme Court. We therefore respectfully request that the California Supreme Court answer the question presented below. If the court declines certification, we will “predict as best we can what the California Supreme Court would do in these circumstances.” See Pacheco v. United States, 220 F.3d 1126, 1131 (9th Cir.2000).

I. CAPTION AND COUNSEL

A. The caption of the case is:

No. 01-56579

INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR KRISHNA CONSCIOUSNESS OF CALIFORNIA, INC., EMIL BECA, COMMITTEE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS IN IRAN, and REZA NABATI, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, STEPHEN YEE, and GILBERT A. SANDOVAL, Defendants-Appellants.

B. The names and addresses of counsel for the parties are:

C. The designation of party to be deemed petitioner:

If the request for certification…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.