Falk

People v. Falk

Good Law
113 Cal. App. 2d 857·1952 Cal. App. LEXIS 1460·249 P.2d 60
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 27, 1952Crim. 4822California1,313 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wiiite, J.

Defendant was accused in an information filed by the district attorney of Los Angeles County with a violation of Health and Safety Code, section 11500, in that she had in her possession cannabis sativa, commonly known as marijuana.

Following the entry of a plea of not guilty the cause proceeded to trial before a jury which found her guilty as charged. Following denial of a motion for a new trial judgment was pronounced.

Defendant prosecutes this appeal “from the judgment and verdict . . . and from the denial of defendant’s motion for a new trial . . . and from the sentence rendered . . .” Since no appeal is authorized from the verdict and sentence, the purported appeal therefrom must be dismissed (Pen. Code, § 1237; People v. Tallman, 27 Cal.2d 209, 215 [ 163 P.2d 857 ]).

The factual background surrounding this prosecution may be thus epitomized: On the night of July 25, 1951, Police Officer Diaz along with other officers was admitted to Apartment 8 in an apartment building located at 1144 South Sierra Bonita,'by one Jerrott Shepherd. A few minutes later, the defendant entered the apartment. The officers searched the apartment, and on the top shelf of a closet, among other…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.