Duprey

Duprey v. Shane

Caution
1952 Cal. LEXIS 305·39 Cal. 2d 781·249 P.2d 8
Supreme Court of CaliforniaOctober 24, 1952S. F. 18614California205 words

Opinion

Opinion

In this malpractice action defendants appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in plaintiff’s favor. Defendants’ chief contention is that because plaintiff was an employee of defendants Shane at the time she was injured, she may not recover damages in this action at law but may only receive compensation in a proceeding before the Industrial Accident Commission under the workmen’s compensation laws of this state. (See Lab. Code, § 3601.) A hearing was granted by this court, after decision by the District Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division One, for the purpose of giving further study to the problems presented. After such study we have concluded that the opinion of the District Court of Appeal, prepared by Presiding Justice Peters, affirming the judgment, correctly treats and disposes of the issues involved, and it is therefore adopted as and for the opinion of this court. Such opinion (with appropriate deletions and addita as indicated) is as follows:

The judgment is affirmed.

Section 3601: “Where the conditions of compensation exist, the right to recover such compensation, pursuant to the provisions of this division is, except as provided in section 3706

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.