Hill

Hill v. State Box Co.

Good Law
114 Cal. App. 2d 44·1952 Cal. App. LEXIS 1133·249 P.2d 903
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 5, 1952Civ. 8167California2,051 words

Opinion

Opinion

Schottky, J.

Appellants, as successors in interest of Eldon L. Cleveland, commenced an action to enjoin respondent, State Box Company, from cutting and removing timber from Section 27, T. 18 N., R. 11 E., in Nevada County, and to quiet appellants’ title to said timber.

Respondent filed an answer denying that appellants had any right to said timber and also filed a cross-complaint in which they asserted their right to said timber under a written contract entered into on June 5, 1944, between Cleveland and respondent, State Box Company.

Said agreement recited that Cleveland was the owner of six described parcels of land, and that he agreed to sell and respondent agreed to buy the merchantable timber on said' land at certain specified price for the different varieties of timber. Respondent was to pay for the timber cut on the tenth of each month of operation, covering the last half of the preceding month, and on the 25th of each month covering the first half of such month. And, as an advance payment, a credit to the extent and in the amount of $20,000 upon anticipated production and upon the ultimate purchase price as determined by the true amount of such merchantable timber. Respondent agreed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.