Collier

People v. Collier

Good Law
113 Cal. App. 2d 861·1952 Cal. App. LEXIS 1461·249 P.2d 72
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 28, 1952Crim. 774California3,998 words

Opinion

Opinion

Barnard, J.

The defendant was charged in Count I with the crime of rape; in Count II with assault with intent to commit rape; in Count III with rape; in Count IY with assault with intent to commit rape;. and in Count Y with assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury. The charges involve four different women, the fourth and fifth counts being different charges in connection with the same incident. The jury found him guilty on the first four counts and made no finding on the fifth count, which was then dismissed. This appeal is from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial.

These four incidents all occurred within a few blocks of each other in the Frontier Housing Project in San Diego, in which project the appellant had lived for several years. No attempt was or is made to challenge, the testimony of the victims, except as to their identification of the appellant. At the trial each of the women positively identified the appellant as her assailant, giving good reasons therefor,, and in each instance her testimony was not shaken by an extensive and able cross-examination. Bach of them had previously picked out the appellant’s picture from seven different…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.