Klein

Klein v. Maddox

Good Law
1943 Cal. App. LEXIS 292·59 Cal. App. 2d 141·138 P.2d 28
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 10, 1943Civ. 12405California1,572 words

Opinion

Opinion

Petebs, J.

Plaintiff brought this action for partition of a parcel of real property in Mariposa County. The trial court made an order confirming the report of a referee that physical partition could not be had without injury to the interests of the parties, and directing the referee to proceed with a sale of the property. From that order defendants appeal. It is the position of defendants that the evidence is insufficient to support the finding that there cannot be a physical partition without prejudice to the parties, and that the order is insufficient because it fails to include a finding on an issue to which reference will hereafter be made. There is no merit in either contention.,

Plaintiff owns a three-fourth undivided interest in the property. The defendants own designated portions of the remaining one-quarter. The propertyffiow contains 2.94 acres. Plaintiff has admittedly been in sole, exclusive and undisputed possession since 1926. Starting in that year plaintiff, at her own cost and expense, improved the property by erecting thereon a main store building, cabins, garage, gas station, pumping plant and wells. Defendants at no time prior to this suit demanded an accounting,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.