Sherman v. Ingelman

Good Law
1943 Cal. App. LEXIS 317·59 Cal. App. 2d 303·138 P.2d 698
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 23, 1943Civ. 13880California1,984 words

Opinion

Opinion

Shinn, J.

This is an appeal by Pullam Sherman from an order dated April 16, 1942, denying his petition for partial distribution under the will of Madeline Baird, deceased, and a judgment settling the final account of the executors and for distribution of all of the estate to said Pullam Sherman. The estate consisted of cash in the amount of $8,614.04, and a promissory note for $11,000 executed by John Ingelman (herein designated as respondent), one of the executors, in favor of the estate of decedent.

Respondent and his co-executor, a corporation, filed their final account, in which they listed the promissory note of Ingelman as one of the assets of the estate; the account was settled and the estate, including the note, was distributed to appellant as sole distributee. Appellant’s contention is that it was the duty of the co-executor, John Ingelman, to account for the amount of the note as for cash on hand. He relies upon section 602 of the Probate Code, which reads as follows : ‘1 The naming of a person as executor does not thereby discharge him from any just claim which the testator has against him, but the claim must be included in the inventory, and the executor is liable for the same…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.