Alonso

Alonso v. Badger

Good Law
1943 Cal. App. LEXIS 107·58 Cal. App. 2d 752·138 P.2d 24
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 25, 1943Civ. 13967California2,236 words

Opinion

Opinion

White, J.

Plaintiffs commenced this action against defendants to recover the value of some 548 head of lambs allegedly sold for the sum of $2,740. For reasons that will hereinafter appear, defendant Stanford filed a cross-complaint wherein he joined one John Montes as a party. The issues framed by the cross-complaint are not before us on this ap peal for the reason that cross-defendant Montes defaulted and judgment was entered against him and in favor of defendant and cross-complainant Stanford for $2,590. At the trial upon the issues raised by plaintiff’s complaint and defendants’ answer the court rendered judgment in favor of the former for $2,740. From such judgment defendant E. C. Badger, doing business as Badger Livestock Commission Company (hereinafter referred to as Badger) alone prosecutes this appeal.

As to the factual background surrounding this litigation, the record discloses that appellant Badger is a licensed livestock commission broker operating at the Union Stockyards in Los Angeles. Defendant Stanford is .a livestock dealer, carrying an account with appellant Badger and using the latter’s brokerage facilities, which permitted him when purchasing livestock from various…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.