Farris

Farris v. Pacific States Auxiliary Corp.

Good Law
1 Cal. 2d 289·1934 Cal. LEXIS 366·34 P.2d 489
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 17, 1934S. F. 14992California329 words

Opinion

Opinion

Motion to dismiss appeal or affirm judgment. On the hearing we denied the motion to dismiss appeal and submitted for decision the motion to affirm the judgment.

The judgment appealed from was upon a directed verdict at the close of the entire evidence in the case. The grounds set forth in the motion of respondent Pacific States Auxiliary Corporation to affirm the judgment are that the appeal is frivolous and that the questions presented are so unsubstantial as not to need further argument. No argument was therefore presented in said respondent’s points and authorities accompanying its motion to affirm judgment to refute the contention appearing in appellant’s brief. The action is for the possession of an apartment house and its furnishings. The appellant, who was the plaintiff in the action, contends in his brief on appeal that at the trial he made out a prima facie case in his favor. He refers to certain evidence in the reporter’s transcript which tends to support this contention. If he is correct in this contention, then the motion for a directed verdict was erroneous as the issue under such circumstances became one of fact to be decided by the jury. Possibly there is evidence…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.