Caminetti

Caminetti v. Board of Trustees of Jackson Union High School District

Good Law
1 Cal. 2d 354·1934 Cal. LEXIS 378·34 P.2d 1021
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 27, 1934Sac. 4870California695 words

Opinion

Opinion

This is an appeal by defendants from a judgment directing that a writ of mandate issue to compel payment of plaintiff’s salary as a teacher. The appeal is on the judgment-roll.

In June, 1930, plaintiff was employed by defendant school district as a probationary teacher, and taught for the school year 1930-1931. Under the provisions of the School Code the teacher is deemed re-employed for the next year unless notice to the contrary is sent by registered mail, or is personally served, on or before June 10th. No valid notice in compliance with the statute was sent, but the district employed another teacher in place of plaintiff, and refused her services when she appeared in September, 1931. In October, 1931, plaintiff commenced a proceeding in the superior court, seeking a writ of mandate to establish her right to teach. The court gave judgment in her favor on October 13, 1931. It decreed that she “is now and has been ever since the commencement of this proceeding, entitled to perform the duties and services of a probationary teacher’’, and ordered that a peremptory writ of mandate issue commanding the Board of Trustees to assign her to a class. The defendants appealed, but the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.