Hall

Hall v. Hagerman

Good Law
107 Cal. App. 2d 523·1951 Cal. App. LEXIS 1939·237 P.2d 80
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 14, 1951Civ. 7976California2,157 words

Opinion

Opinion

Van Dyke, J.

On July 22, 1947, the parties hereto became copartners under written articles. The business of the firm was the wholesaling and retailing of candy, nuts, gum and allied lines of merchandise. The business centered in Napa and involved three sales routes for the covering of which the partnership had three trucks, two driven by the copartners and one by an employee. On July 23, 1948, the partners executed a document entitled “Agreement for Dissolution of Partnership,” and this action arose out of the varying interpretations which the parties thereto placed upon that instrument. The action was begun by Hall who filed a complaint against Hagerman in the form of a common count .for money.had and received, claiming recovery of the sum of $1,347.90. No mention of the partnership was made in that pleading. Hagerman answered,' denying generally the common count allegations of the complaint. He also counterclaimed for money had and received, seeking recovery of $96.54. He cross-complained for the same amount and in that pleading he alleged the execution of the articles of the co-partnership and the execution of the dissolution agreement, attaching both documents to his pleadings as exhibits.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.