Eddleman

Eddleman v. Deavel

Good Law
107 Cal. App. 2d 351·1951 Cal. App. LEXIS 1910·237 P.2d 38
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 7, 1951Civ. 18262California1,576 words

Opinion

Opinion

Shinn, J.

This is an action brought by plaintiff vendor to terminate the rights of defendants Deavel in and to a residential property in South Pasadena, and to quiet title to the same. The theory of the action is that defendants defaulted under their contract to purchase the property. The sequence of events alleged in the complaint is the following: On March 1, 1947, defendants agreed to buy the property for $7,500, payable $60 down and $60 per month commencing April 1, 1947, which payments would include interest at the rate of 5 per cent per annum, payable monthly; on November 30, 1948, defendants were in default and were given notice demanding payment of the arrearage within five days; on July 6, 1949, defendants were notified that because of their default their rights under the contract were terminated; that $60 per month is the reasonable rental value of the premises; that defendants have remained in possession to plaintiff’s damage in the sum of $500. Defendants answered, alleging that plaintiff had waived strict performance by accepting payments after their due dates, that on December 6, 1948, defendants tendered the total amount of the accrued payments on the contract, the tender was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.