Rosenaur v. Rosenaur

Good Law
107 Cal. App. 2d 461·1951 Cal. App. LEXIS 1927·237 P.2d 17
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 9, 1951Civ. 18557California703 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wilson, J.

The question here is whether the court erred in refusing to award to a minor child a probate homestead from his father’s estate in these circumstances: The child is the natural son of decedent and a former wife, having resided with and been in the custody of his mother at all times since her divorce from his father; decedent had remarried and left surviving him a widow and two minor children of the second marriage with whom he resided at the time of his decease; decedent left at least one parcel of tenantable real property-consisting of a building containing six apartment units and commercial store rooms.

This appeal is from the order denying the petition of the minor’s guardian for the setting aside of a probate homestead to him during his minority.

The authority of the court to set apart a homestead from property of a decedent is found in section 661 of the Probate Code, the applicable part of which reads: “If none has been selected, designated, and recorded . . . the court, in the manner hereinafter provided, must select, designate and set apart and cause to be recorded a homestead for the use of the surviving spouse and the minor children, or, if there be no surviving…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.