Saks & Co. v. City of Beverly Hills

Bad Law
107 Cal. App. 2d 260·1951 Cal. App. LEXIS 1894·237 P.2d 32
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 5, 1951Civ. 18037, 18038California2,492 words

Opinion

Opinion

McCOMB, J.

This is an appeal by defendant (City of Beverly Hills) from two judgments in favor of plaintiff. The first action filed contains two counts, one for an injunction and one for declaratory relief.

The first count seeks to restrain the enforcement of the revocation of certain temporary variances in zoning ordinances, and the second count seeks a declaration respecting plaintiff’s rights thereto. The second action, in certiorari and mandamus, is to review certain revocation orders of the zoning variances theretofore granted to plaintiff which had been adopted by defendants. The cases were consolidated for trial before the court without a jury. Separate judgments were entered and separate appeals taken which, since both actions involve the same issues, have been consolidated on appeal and will be disposed of together.

Facts: In 1936 defendant city had in effect Zoning Ordinance No. 443 which established the land use permissible for each parcel of land within the city. The greater portion of the city was zoned for single-family residential use. Commercial use was confined largely to the area enclosed by Santa Monica Boulevard on the northwest, the alley south of Wilshire Boulevard on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.