Royat

Royat v. Roberts

Good Law
107 Cal. App. 2d 447·1951 Cal. App. LEXIS 1924·237 P.2d 25
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 8, 1951Civ. 8032California1,214 words

Opinion

Opinion

Van Dyke, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that appellants have accepted the benefits of the judgment entered in their favor. Thi§ requires an analysis of the pleadings, findings and judgment.

The appellants brought this action to recover possession of a tractor, and for damages resulting from the unlawful detention of said tractor by the defendants. Defendant Bank of America by its answer denied that appellants were entitled to the possession of the tractor; denied that it had taken possession of the property; and alleged that the tractor was “subject to a chattel mortgage dated July 22, 1946, by which all of said property was mortgaged to this defendant to secure a promissory note, also dated July 22, 1946, and all sums that might be thereafter advanced by this defendant to the mortgagor [defendant Roberts], all indebtednesses and obligations that might be thereafter incurred by the mortgagor to this defendant, . . .; and that the amount now due, owing and unpaid to this defendant and secured by said chattel mortgage is Three Thousand Five Hundred and Seventeen and 54/100 Dollars ($3,517.54), plus interest, costs, charges, and attorneys’ fees.” The answers of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.