Coyne

Coyne v. Nelson

Good Law
107 Cal. App. 2d 469·1951 Cal. App. LEXIS 1930·237 P.2d 45
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 9, 1951Civ. 18318California2,236 words

Opinion

Opinion

Vickers, J.

Action for damages for false imprisonment. Judgment for plaintiff.

Plaintiff-respondent filed suit against the appellant Ebbert, a police officer, and several other defendants for damages for false imprisonment. After trial before the court without a jury, the plaintiff having dismissed as to the defendants Dan Nelson and L. M. Nevarez, the court gave judgment against the appellant’ and the defendants Michael Krempels and James Snyder for. $750, as compensatory damages, and against the appellant and the defendant Michael Krempels for $500, as punitive damages. Thereafter the appellant and these defendants moved for a new trial. The court denied such motions. From the judgment and the order denying a new trial Ebbert alone , appeals. The appellant attacks the judgment on the ground that the evidence does not support some of the findings and that the findings as to compensatory damages are irreconcilable.

The court found in part as follows: That the respondent, a real estate broker, was falsely accused by appellant (and other defendants) of stealing property and was falsely arrested and imprisoned by appellant against respondent’s will; that in so doing appellant did not believe…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.