Faye

Faye v. Feldman

Good Law
128 Cal. App. 2d 319·1954 Cal. App. LEXIS 1467·275 P.2d 121
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 25, 1954Civ. 20158California4,904 words

Opinion

Opinion

Vallee, J.

Plaintiff brought this action against defendants Gertrude Feldman and Sam Feldman for damages for alleged wrongful attachments levied in an action on a promissory note and against Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, the company which issued the undertakings on the attachments.

Three prior actions are involved. First: An action, numbered 572587, brought by defendant Gertrude Feldman against F. & F. Development Corporation, Bernard Faye— plaintiff in this action, and Sam Feldman—defendant in this action, on a promissory note in which an affirmative defense of nondelivery was sustained. That is the action in which the alleged wrongful attachments were issued. Second: An action, numbered 584331, brought by Gertrude and Sam Feldman-—defendants in this action, against F. & F. Development Corporation, Bernard Faye—plaintiff in this action, and Celina Faye, in which the plaintiffs in that action sought dissolution of the corporation, an accounting by Bernard Faye for any indebtedness due from him to the corporation, and payment of the corporation’s debts to the Feldmans. Third: An action, numbered 584333, brought by Sam Feldman and F. & F. Development Corporation against Bernard…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.