Lopez

United States v. Lopez

Good Law
534 F.3d 1027·2008 WL 2891070·2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 16001
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 29, 200807-35389California3,822 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fisher, J.

ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND AMENDED OPINION

ORDER

The opinion filed July 16, 2008, is amended as follows:

At Slip Op. 8785, line 34: Change “Counsel for one of the co-defendants told ...” to “Frank Cikutovich, counsel for one of the co-defendants, told ... ”.

At Slip Op. 8786, line 24: Change “Bailey to Agent Rice or ...” to “Bailey to Rice or ... ”.

At Slip Op. 8792 [4], line 1: Amend to read “In this case, because Lopez cannot carry the lesser burden of establishing a Brady violation that would entitle Lopez to habeas relief, had this been Lopez’s first habeas petition, she cannot carry the greater burden ... ”.

At Slip Op. 8794 [6], line 4: Amend to read “... Lopez has not established the existence of such a Brady violation that warrants habeas relief, had this been Lopez’s first habeas petition.”.

OPINION

Gabriele Lopez, a.k.a. Gabriele Koenig (“Lopez”), filed a federal habeas corpus motion in the district court seeking to vacate her drug conviction because the government withheld until long after her trial potentially damaging credibility information about one of the government’s principal witnesses, in violation of the government’s disclosure obligations under Brady…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.