Lakin

Lakin v. Watkins Associated Industries

Bad Law
1993 Cal. LEXIS 6126·25 Cal. Rptr. 2d 109·6 Cal. 4th 644·93 Daily Journal DAR 16002·863 P.2d 179
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 16, 1993S030179California7,735 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mosk, J.

We granted review to decide three issues. First, we must determine whether a postjudgment order denying an award of attorney fees under Code of Civil Procedure section 2033, subdivision (o), is appealable. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that it is. Second, we must determine where the burden of proof lies when a plaintiff in a personal injury case claims prejudgment interest, under Civil Code section 3291, on a judgment more favorable than her offer to compromise under Code of Civil Procedure section 998, subdivision (b). As will appear, we conclude the plaintiff has the burden of proving what portion of the total award represents damages for personal injury; we further conclude that plaintiff herein has not yet had the opportunity to carry this burden. Accordingly, the judgment of the Court of Appeal on these issues holding to the contrary will be reversed. Finally, we must determine whether prejudgment interest under Civil Code section 3291 may be awarded on punitive damages. We conclude that it may not.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

At the scene of an accident in which a truck that defendant driver was operating on behalf of defendant trucking company…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.