Rattlesnake Coalition v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Good Law
509 F.3d 1095·53 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 723·37 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20300·2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 28310
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 7, 200705-36097California4,131 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gould, J.

The Rattlesnake Coalition (“The Coalition”) appeals the district court’s dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and lack of standing of its action against the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“the EPA”), the Administrator of the EPA, and the City of Missoula (“Mis-soula”). The Coalition brought suit under the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), 42 U.S.C. § 4321 , seeking in-junctive, declaratory, and other relief related to the preparation of Environmental Assessments (“EAs”) and Environmental Impact Statements (“EISs”) prior to implementation of the Missoula Wastewater Facilities Plan Update (“MWFPU”). The Coalition argues that the district court erred by evaluating its complaint as two separate NEPA claims relating to two constituent projects of the MWFPU, and thereby concluding that the MWFPU itself was not a single, major federal action subject to NEPA regulations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm the district court.

I

In the 1980s Missoula planned and made many improvements to its wastewater treatment and collection system. In 1995, Missoula created the Wastewater Advisory Group, consisting of representatives from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.