Blanchard

Blanchard v. Morton School District

Caution
509 F.3d 934·2007 WL 4225789·2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 27940
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 3, 200706-35388California1,573 words

Opinion

Opinion

Schroeder, J.

ORDER

The Opinion filed on September 20, 2007 [ 504 F.3d 771 ], is amended as follows: on slip Opinion page 12821 [ 504 F.3d at 775 ], remove lines 21 through 34, and insert the following text:

No future petitions for rehearing or petitions for rehearing en banc will be entertained.

OPINION

Plaintiff-Appellant Cheryl Blanchard seeks damages to compensate her for lost income and the emotional distress she experienced during her ultimately successful efforts to obtain benefits for her son under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482 . When this matter was before us previously, we reversed the district court’s dismissal for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Blanchard v. Morton Sch. Dist., 420 F.3d 918 (9th Cir.2005) (“Blanchard I”). We held that, because Blanchard sought damages on her own behalf rather than her son’s, no administrative remedies existed. Id. at 921-22 . We expressed no opinion on the merits of her claim. Id. at 922 .

On remand, the district court granted summary judgment for Defendants, holding that Blanchard had no individual rights under the IDEA and that the IDEA’S enforcement scheme did not contemplate the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.