Diggs

People v. Diggs

Good Law
161 Cal. App. 2d 167·1958 Cal. App. LEXIS 1715·326 P.2d 194
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 9, 1958Crim. 3485California1,613 words

Opinion

Opinion

Peters, J.

Freddie Diggs was charged with the unlawful sale and with the unlawful possession of marijuana, and with several priors. He was found guilty on both counts charged, and admitted priors of burglary and forgery. He appeals from the judgment entered on the verdict and from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

His sole contention on this appeal is that all of the evidence introduced against him was secured as the result of an unlawful search and seizure after an unlawful arrest. There is no merit to the contention.

The two offenses are alleged to have occurred on July 27, 1957. Sergeant Hilliard, attached to the Special Service Bureau of the Oakland Police Department, testified that about a month before July 27, 1957, he received information from a confidential informant that one Raymond Bardwell was selling narcotics in apartment 9 of 1026 Brush Street, Oakland, and that Bardwell had several other men staying with him. The informant had previously given Hilliard reliable information on such matters. The name of this informant was not requested by the defense, nor was there an objection to or a motion to strike this testimony.

On the evening of July 27, 1957, another…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.