Rupp

Rupp v. Summerfield

Good Law
161 Cal. App. 2d 657·1958 Cal. App. LEXIS 1789·326 P.2d 912
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 26, 1958Civ. 22947California3,325 words

Opinion

Opinion

Lillie, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict awarding plaintiff $3,000 general damages and $2,000 punitive damages in a malicious prosecution action.

The basis for plaintiff’s claim was a criminal prosecution in which he was charged with grand theft and which was dismissed by the court after a preliminary hearing at which defendant and appellant herein testified.

On this appeal, appellant makes no claim that.the evidence was insufficient to support the judgment or that the damages were excessive, but submits error on the part of the trial court in admitting into evidence the transcript of the preliminary hearing and in giving certain instructions to the jury.

Plaintiff and defendant had what might be described as an intimate and close personal friendship. Almost immediately after they met, defendant gave plaintiff expensive presents, clothing, money and jewelry. He opened a joint bank account with plaintiff, giving him access, at one time, to close to $4,500 of his money. He paid for a Jaguar and Cadillac for plaintiff and rented him an apartment, partially furnishing it. They traveled extensively and when in Los Angeles defendant was a constant nightly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.