Ashburn

Ashburn v. Miller

Good Law
161 Cal. App. 2d 71·1958 Cal. App. LEXIS 1706·326 P.2d 229
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 4, 1958Civ. 22584California5,950 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ashburn, J.

Plaintiffs Harris G. Ashburn and Virginia E. Ashburn, husband and wife, sued defendants Lawrence M. Miller and Doris L. Miller, husband and wife, for damages for fraud in the sale to them of a hillside lot in the Mulholland Drive—Laurel Canyon area of Los Angeles, the fraud consisting of misrepresentations concerning the fact that the lot consisted largely of uncompacted fill. The lot sloped downward to the east and the rear or north. In the process of preparing a site for building a residence plaintiffs had to excavate filled material varying in depth from 6 feet to 13 feet, a total of some 1,000 to 1,100 cubic yards, and also had to bring in approximately 500 cubic yards of dirt in order to compact a suitable building site, all at a cost of $1,605.75. The court, after a nonjury trial, found for plaintiffs on the charge of fraud and awarded damages in the sum of $3,000. Defendants appeal, urging insufficiency of the evidence to prove a fraud or to sustain the award of damages. The •evidence is conflicting upon both of said issues.

We stated the applicable principles of review of conflicting evidence in New v. New, 148 Cal.App.2d 372, 383-384 [ 306 P.2d 987 ] : “The appellate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.